9 Nuclear Energy Myths Dispelled

Spoiler: It’s clean, green and sustainable.

1 — Environmental impact; it is widely argued that nuclear waste and spent fuel are environmental hazards and a reason to not pursue the nuclear energy electricity generation option.

However, it must be understood that all energy sources have an environmental impact. The production of solar panels as an example emits toxic chemicals as by-products and the panels themselves are non-biodegradable.

Of course, radioactive waste needs to be disposed of and work is ongoing to review and improve this process.

2 — The economics; renewable energy is believed that renewable energy is the much cheaper option in the long run. However, the technology does not exist to provide security of supply and there is much investment needed to get there.

It could be argued that you use this investment to better the nuclear energy, disposal and decommissioning processes that are already in existence.

3 — Nuclear safety; it is often argued that nuclear is the most affordable long-term energy option going forward. However, this comment is usually followed up by the argument that it is not the most safe solution. This is not true in the main.

The likes of the Chernobyl or Fukushima disasters are being referenced here. Chernobyl has been proven to be down to poor design and mismanagement and Fukushima was hit with a 42-foot tsunami. Recent reactors are…